Quantcast SDSU Collegian
College Media Network

Legislature ignores privacy issue

Roxy Hammond

Issue date: 3/12/08 Section: Opinion & Editorial
  • Print
  • Email
Roxy Hammond, Sarcastic Cynicisms
Media Credit: Ty Carlson
Roxy Hammond, Sarcastic Cynicisms
[Click to enlarge]
The South Dakota State Legislature has been busy regulating our sex lives again.

The mostly-male legislature passed/failed two measures this session-one that requires a doctor to offer a woman a view of her ultrasound before her abortion (SB-88) and one that would have removed legal protection to pharmacists that deny medication, including birth control, if they feel it could be used for suicide, or it goes against their conscience (SB-164).

I will give you three guesses which one they passed and which one they failed.

This scares me a little bit, for two reasons.

First, that the S.D. legislature has nothing better to do with their time than make sure that a woman signs a paper that says she was offered an ultrasound (which is already regular practice). This is their idea of preventing abortions. If the woman sees her baby and feels so awful about it, she will carry it to term. We are giving her the 'opportunity' to think it over. Voile, pro-life via guilt-trip.

Secondly, these two actions are completely counterproductive to each other. I know that it may not have passed through the morally blinded minds of some of these legislators, but preventing women from getting birth control is not going to cut down on unwanted pregnancies. They're not going to be like, 'Well, shucks. This pharmacist is morally opposed to my birth control pills (which, might I add, he/she has no real idea why the person is taking them); so I might as well be celibate!'

This is reality calling, please wake up.

Now, I am not advocating abortion. And I am not advocating promiscuity. What I am advocating is allowing people to take responsibility for their own lives. The ones that are attempting to get these birth control pills are the ones that are trying to prevent conceiving the babies that may then be aborted. I have been saying this from the start-if you want to reduce abortion, do not make it illegal, make it easier to prevent.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 2

David (MN)

posted 3/17/08 @ 6:38 PM CST

I'm having trouble understanding all of the opposition to the actions of the S.D. Legislature.

The comments in this article against SB 88 are:
1) S. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Do you think SDSU students should be allowed to have guns on campus?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement